Senegalese asylum criminal Fatou Gaye has been jailed for 18 months after admitting lying about her background.
Gaye, 38, and her son Arouna were originally removed from their home in Glasgow during a dawn raid in May. It was only during Gaye’s deportation to Ivory Coast that it became clear that she actually came from peaceful Senegal, and not from war-torn Ivory Coast at all.
Luton Crown Court was told Gaye had duped sympathetic politicians and cost the taxpayer more than £100,000.
Gaye’s case was very publicly endorsed by Glasgow Scottish National Party MP John Mason in the House of Commons and by MSP Christina McKelvie, who even wrote to the Home Secretary. Both had claimed that asylum criminal Gaye came from Ivory Coast.
The Scottish Prosecutor, Mrs Elliot, told Luton Crown Court that asylum crook Gaye was given “cash, food tokens and accommodation” and had cost taxpayers “more than £100,000” in taxpayer-funded legal aid.
Mrs Elliott said: “The defendant embarked on a web of deceit which involved members of Parliament and continued for some years.”
This case has many features which are remarkable only because they have been transparently aired and proven in a court of law. Without doubt, similar events must be happening away from the public gaze day-in, day-out, all over the country.
Firstly, Mrs Gaye was an unsophisticated and ill-educated African, who nevertheless had no difficulty whatsoever in persuading naive immigration officers that she hailed from a country she had never visited, whose language she did not even speak. The evidence presented to the court indicated that Gaye was coached in her lies by representatives of the colossal and lucrative bogus asylum seeker industry, which exists only to exploit , at taxpayers’ expense, numerous gaping loopholes in the asylum system.
Secondly, Mrs Gaye’s case epitomised those tiresome cause-celebres, where naive, reedy-voiced churchmen tediously team up with craven Marxist politicians to demand that this, or that, asylum criminal “must stay” in Britain. Next time we read about one of these cases, it would be wise to assume, until the contrary is proven, that the asylum-seekers concerned are perfidious fraudsters and that those who leap to their defence are either credulous fools, or motivated by sheer anti-British prejudice.
Thirdly, it is striking that Gaye was easily able to secure £100,000 of publicly-funded legal aid, simply by uttering the magic words “asylum seeker”. Of course, none of the hundreds of BNP teachers, Civil Servants, council workers and nurses targeted for persecution by the Labour Party for their political affiliations can expect to receive a single penny’s worth of legal aid, even if their ancestors have lived in this land for a thousand years, and even if they themselves have dutifully surrendered their taxes to a greedy state throughout their working lives.
Finally, lest anyone take comfort from Gaye’s conviction, it should be noted that she is now back in Britain once again. Who would place on a bet on her ever being rightfully deported?
The late J. Enoch Powell once famously proclaimed that “those whom the Gods wish to destroy, they first make mad”, but even the far-sighted Mr Powell could not have predicted that the keys to the Asylum gates would one day be handed over to a parade of lunatics.
These two scumbags have pleaded guilty to the robbery and manslaughter of Lily Finlay, 87.
