Pakistani chain immigration based on marriage is “importing poverty” to Britain, Labour Party MP Ann Cryer has confessed, confirming once again that the British National Party policy is correct.
Ms Cryer made the remarks in an interview in a recent edition of The Economist magazine, which also revealed that every year at least 250,000 Pakistanis come to Britain in what it described as an “immigration superhighway.”
Each year, 350,000 Pakistanis go back temporarily to visit their country of origin, most often to bring back brides to perpetuate the immigration chain.
This shocking flow of people from one of the world’s most unstable Muslim states has become the primary source of terrorism and poverty generation in Britain, The Economist asserts.
”One reason why shop signs on the streets of Bradford are still written in Urdu, half a century after the first Pakistanis came to Britain, is that population flows between the two countries remain large,” said The Economist.
“Links are reinforced by ingrained marriage customs: six of ten ethnic Pakistanis in Britain pick a spouse from Pakistan.”
Ms Cryer made the remarks in an interview in a recent edition of The Economist magazine, which also revealed that every year at least 250,000 Pakistanis come to Britain in what it described as an “immigration superhighway.”
Each year, 350,000 Pakistanis go back temporarily to visit their country of origin, most often to bring back brides to perpetuate the immigration chain.
This shocking flow of people from one of the world’s most unstable Muslim states has become the primary source of terrorism and poverty generation in Britain, The Economist asserts.
”One reason why shop signs on the streets of Bradford are still written in Urdu, half a century after the first Pakistanis came to Britain, is that population flows between the two countries remain large,” said The Economist.
“Links are reinforced by ingrained marriage customs: six of ten ethnic Pakistanis in Britain pick a spouse from Pakistan.”
But the easy comings and goings between Britain and “the most dangerous place in the world,” as President Barack Obama recently dubbed Pakistan’s western regions, is causing concern, The Economist continued.
“On April 8th British police arrested 12 men on suspicion of involvement in what officers say was a ‘very, very big’ terrorist plot. Ten were Pakistani citizens on student visas.
“The porous border between Britain and Pakistan is frequently abused. In December Gordon Brown said that three-quarters of domestic terrorist plots being monitored by MI5 had links to Pakistan.
“The heaviest flows of human traffic between Britain and Pakistan, however, are within families. Ann Cryer, the MP for Keighley, a town near Bradford with a large Pakistani population, reckons that as many as 80 percent of Muslim marriages in the area are transcontinental. This may reflect a cultural preference but it is also ‘a way of getting around immigration controls,’ Ms Cryer says.
“For a goatherd in Mirpur, ‘marrying a cousin in Keighley is a leg-up.’ Elderly parents can be shipped over later.
“Only a minority of these marriages are forced, most people agree. British-born men are willing to marry Pakistani girls to stay in their parents’ good books; in any case, some carry on relationships with a local woman. British girls are less keen, but local Muslim men are in short supply owing to their own Pakistani marriages.
“Alan Manning and Andreas Georgiadis of the London School of Economics crunched data to show that British-born Pakistanis, or those who immigrated as children, are more likely to have foreign spouses than those who came to Britain as adults,” said The Economist.
* The British National Party has been the only party to consistently link mass Third World immigration to increased poverty levels, social unrest and terrorism. It is too late for the appropriately named Ms Cryer to cry about the effects of policies which she has helped generate: the only answer to the problem is now to vote for the BNP.
0 comments:
Post a Comment