THE rise of the British National Party has forced the Government to backtrack on its long-standing open door, “let ’em all in” immigration policy.
Immigration Minister Phil Woolas, has brazenly lifted policy from the BNP manifesto and called upon British employers to give priority in jobs to Britons rather than migrant workers and to make it a priority to retrain and ‘up-skill’ British workers.
Faced with the impossible task of building eleven new cities the size of Birmingham in the next 25 years just to house the immigrant population explosion, Woolas, also broke new ground when he announced: “On a common sense level, there has to be a limit to population. You have to have a policy that thinks about the population implication as well as the immigration implications”.
Common sense it may be, but it has taken an awful long time to dawn on any spokesman from the three ‘old gang parties’. For the past thirty years Conservative, Labour and Liberal Democrat politicians have had an agreement that immigration should never be discussed and those politicians that do be branded as ‘racist’ and ‘extremist’.
But don’t hold your breath that this Damascene conversion is going to lead any stemming of the immigrant flood. Woolas admitted that as long as Britain stays in the European Union, there is nothing at all that the Government can do to stop the influx from Eastern Europe.
He also made it crystal clear that profit and greed still remained priorities for Labour over preserving the identity of the indigenous peoples of Britain and their way of life, He said: “We will control the numbers of people coming to work based on the needs of the economy”.
In stark contrast, the British National Party puts the interests of our people and our national survival ahead of the profits of the big business bosses who bankroll the Labour Government and the British economy. The most pressing economic issue in terms of jobs is that over the past two years 865,000 more immigrants are working in Britain at the expense of 365,000 fewer native Britons in work, and that is a scandal.
Nonetheless, an important watershed in terms of the immigration debate has been passed and a crucial - if blindingly obvious - point conceded after decades of official denial. But why this abrupt about-face and dawning of ‘common sense’ - as Woolas calls what the BNP have been saying for years?
Government sources have made it clear to the media that they are increasingly worried about the growth of the British National Party, and now feel the need to appear to do, or at least say, something to counter it.
This proves that even at this early stage in the growth of our Party and our modest elections results compared to those of the establishment parties, we can already have an influence on Government policy. The moral of this is clear. If the vote, and electoral representation, we already have can persuade the Government to make concessions to the views of BNP voters, imagine just how much more effect we could have if those votes and victories increased substantially?
Remember that a vote for the BNP is never wasted, because even at this stage of our development, there is fear amongst the corrupt and treasonous leaders of the main parties, not of what we are now but of what we might become, and this forces them to take on board our policies in a desperate effort to limit our support.
They hope that such token words and gestures will buy off our support base and herd BNP voters back into the Establishment’s sheep pen. But if our supporters, especially those still only thinking about voting for us keep their heads and see the System’s weakness for what it is, long before we reach power our influence will be directing policy. The bigger the BNP grows, the more our opponents will concede to us in a forlorn effort to make the British people go back to sleep.
But Labour and the Tories won’t concede on fundamentals - they won’t for example leave the European Union, without which effective control of immigration is simply impossible. But they will, grudgingly, be forced to take some actions, such as placing limits on Third World immigration, which will help buy our people time until the BNP can come to power and take the necessary decisive action.
Martin Wingfield
Immigration Minister Phil Woolas, has brazenly lifted policy from the BNP manifesto and called upon British employers to give priority in jobs to Britons rather than migrant workers and to make it a priority to retrain and ‘up-skill’ British workers.
Faced with the impossible task of building eleven new cities the size of Birmingham in the next 25 years just to house the immigrant population explosion, Woolas, also broke new ground when he announced: “On a common sense level, there has to be a limit to population. You have to have a policy that thinks about the population implication as well as the immigration implications”.
Common sense it may be, but it has taken an awful long time to dawn on any spokesman from the three ‘old gang parties’. For the past thirty years Conservative, Labour and Liberal Democrat politicians have had an agreement that immigration should never be discussed and those politicians that do be branded as ‘racist’ and ‘extremist’.
But don’t hold your breath that this Damascene conversion is going to lead any stemming of the immigrant flood. Woolas admitted that as long as Britain stays in the European Union, there is nothing at all that the Government can do to stop the influx from Eastern Europe.
He also made it crystal clear that profit and greed still remained priorities for Labour over preserving the identity of the indigenous peoples of Britain and their way of life, He said: “We will control the numbers of people coming to work based on the needs of the economy”.
In stark contrast, the British National Party puts the interests of our people and our national survival ahead of the profits of the big business bosses who bankroll the Labour Government and the British economy. The most pressing economic issue in terms of jobs is that over the past two years 865,000 more immigrants are working in Britain at the expense of 365,000 fewer native Britons in work, and that is a scandal.
Nonetheless, an important watershed in terms of the immigration debate has been passed and a crucial - if blindingly obvious - point conceded after decades of official denial. But why this abrupt about-face and dawning of ‘common sense’ - as Woolas calls what the BNP have been saying for years?
Government sources have made it clear to the media that they are increasingly worried about the growth of the British National Party, and now feel the need to appear to do, or at least say, something to counter it.
This proves that even at this early stage in the growth of our Party and our modest elections results compared to those of the establishment parties, we can already have an influence on Government policy. The moral of this is clear. If the vote, and electoral representation, we already have can persuade the Government to make concessions to the views of BNP voters, imagine just how much more effect we could have if those votes and victories increased substantially?
Remember that a vote for the BNP is never wasted, because even at this stage of our development, there is fear amongst the corrupt and treasonous leaders of the main parties, not of what we are now but of what we might become, and this forces them to take on board our policies in a desperate effort to limit our support.
They hope that such token words and gestures will buy off our support base and herd BNP voters back into the Establishment’s sheep pen. But if our supporters, especially those still only thinking about voting for us keep their heads and see the System’s weakness for what it is, long before we reach power our influence will be directing policy. The bigger the BNP grows, the more our opponents will concede to us in a forlorn effort to make the British people go back to sleep.
But Labour and the Tories won’t concede on fundamentals - they won’t for example leave the European Union, without which effective control of immigration is simply impossible. But they will, grudgingly, be forced to take some actions, such as placing limits on Third World immigration, which will help buy our people time until the BNP can come to power and take the necessary decisive action.
Martin Wingfield
0 comments:
Post a Comment